Recall Register

1995 Mitsubishi Eclipse: recalls and complaints

NHTSA lists 5 recall campaigns for the 1995 Mitsubishi Eclipse. The newest campaign is 00V421001. NHTSA received the report on 18 Dec 2000. The NHTSA record gives the component Suspension / Front / Control Arm / Lower Ball Joint. NHTSA has 304 complaints on file for this model year. 4 NHTSA investigations name this model year.

The NHTSA recall file shows no do-not-drive advisory and no park-outside advisory on these campaigns.

This page cannot show if a recall applies to one vehicle. The NHTSA VIN lookup shows the unrepaired recalls of one vehicle.

Remedy of the newest campaign, 00V421001, in the NHTSA record

Dealers will inspect the lower lateral arm ball joint for wear. Ball joints that exhibit wear beyond the established tolerance will be replaced with newly designed lateral arm ball joints. Ball joints that are within the established tolerance will be cleaned and a special sealant will be applied to prevent intrusion of moisture.

Complaint information entered into NHTSA’s Office of Defects Investigation vehicle owner's complaint database is used with other data sources to identify safety issues that warrant investigation and to determine if a safety-related defect trend exists.

NHTSA publishes these words. Source: NHTSA Datasets and APIs, section Complaints, read on . Complaint file through . Recall file through .

Since the last update

No tracked figure of this page changed in a data update. What the log tracks

All updates to the register

Recall campaigns

5 campaigns, newest first. 904,896 units in total.

  • 00V421001Suspension / Front / Control Arm / Lower Ball Joint
  • 99V066001Suspension / Front / Control Arm / Lower Ball Joint
  • 98V069001Power Train / Automatic Transmission
  • 96V158001Fuel System, Gasoline
  • 94V149002Service Brakes, Hydraulic / Antilock/Traction Control/Electronic Limited Slip
  1. 00V421001Received . 567,432 units.

    Suspension / Front / Control Arm / Lower Ball Joint

    Defect, in the NHTSA record
    Vehicle description: passenger vehicles. If the rubber boots on the lower lateral arm ball joints of the front suspension were damaged during assembly, dirt and water can intrude. Also, mmc has added the potential of leaking moisture, which can cause the ball stud to corrode.
    Consequence, in the NHTSA record
    This condition could cause the lower lateral arm ball joint to separate, increasing the risk of a vehicle crash. This campaign supercedes mmc's previous safety recall campaign, see 99v-066.
    Remedy, in the NHTSA record
    Dealers will inspect the lower lateral arm ball joint for wear. Ball joints that exhibit wear beyond the established tolerance will be replaced with newly designed lateral arm ball joints. Ball joints that are within the established tolerance will be cleaned and a special sealant will be applied to prevent intrusion of moisture.

    Report filed by MITSUBISHI AMERICA. Owner notification date in the NHTSA record: .

  2. 99V066001Received . 307,000 units.

    Suspension / Front / Control Arm / Lower Ball Joint

    Defect, in the NHTSA record
    Vehicle description: passenger vehicles. If the rubber boots on the lower lateral arm ball joints of the front suspension were damaged during assembly, dirt and water can intrude.
    Consequence, in the NHTSA record
    This condition could cause the lower lateral arm ball joint to separate, increasing the risk of a vehicle crash.
    Remedy, in the NHTSA record
    Dealers will inspect the rubber boots, and if the boot is damaged, they will replace the lower lateral arm and ball joint on the affected vehicles.

    Report filed by MITSUBISHI AMERICA. Owner notification date in the NHTSA record: .

  3. 98V069001Received . 24,275 units.

    Power Train / Automatic Transmission

    Defect, in the NHTSA record
    Vehicle description: passenger vehicles. Lockup of the transfer case can occur due to insufficient lubrication.
    Consequence, in the NHTSA record
    This condition can cause a loss of vehicle control, increasing the risk of a crash.
    Remedy, in the NHTSA record
    Dealers will inspect the vehicles for adequacy of the transfer case oil volume, transfer case oil leakage, and operational degradation of the transfer case mechanism. If oil volume is insufficient, the appropriate amount of oil will be added. If there is transfer case oil leakage, affected components will be replaced. If the transfer case shows operational degradation, the transfer case will be replaced.

    Report filed by MITSUBISHI AMERICA. Owner notification date in the NHTSA record: .

  4. 96V158001Received . 5,731 units.

    Fuel System, Gasoline

    Defect, in the NHTSA record
    The fuel tank gaskets for the fuel pump and/or gauge unit gasket could have been incorrectly installed allowing fuel or fumes to escape.
    Consequence, in the NHTSA record
    If an ignition source were present, the fuel leakage could result in a fire.
    Remedy, in the NHTSA record
    Dealers will inspect the fuel tank and if the gaskets are found to be leaking, replace the fuel tank, caps and gaskets.

    Report filed by MITSUBISHI AMERICA.

  5. 94V149002Received . 458 units.

    Service Brakes, Hydraulic / Antilock/Traction Control/Electronic Limited Slip

    Defect, in the NHTSA record
    The headlamp support panel can develop a fatigue crack where the anti-lock brake system (ABS) hydraulic unit is attached, allowing the hydraulic unit to fall down.
    Consequence, in the NHTSA record
    Loss of braking can result if the ABS hydraulic unit falls. This can result in a vehicle accident.
    Remedy, in the NHTSA record
    Dealers will connect the ABS hydraulic unit attachment point at a rigid portion of the headlamp support panel with a bracket and reinforce the headlamp support panel by adding a back plate.

    Report filed by MITSUBISHI AMERICA. Owner notification date in the NHTSA record: .

The campaign number opens the NHTSA record. Each quotation is the text of the NHTSA recall file.

Recall campaign: One recall in the NHTSA recall file, with one campaign number. A campaign can name many makes, models and model years.

Units: The number of vehicles or products that a recall can include. The manufacturer or the firm reports the number to the agency.

Complaints by component

304 complaints, 435 component mentions.

A complaint can name more than one component. Each component that a complaint names is one component mention. The figure per 1,000 component mentions shows how many of each 1,000 mentions name the component.

  • 1995 Mitsubishi Eclipse
  • All 1995 vehicles
1995 Mitsubishi Eclipse: complaints by component, per 1,000 component mentions
Component1995 EclipseAll 1995 vehiclesEclipse, all yearsMentions
Engine and Engine Cooling147.1148.5112.564
Electrical System13177.564.357
Power Train124.1110.6135.154
Service Brakes, Hydraulic119.5140.97352
Suspension112.648.46349
Air Bags80.571.358.635
Fuel System, Gasoline50.645.824.822
Structure32.238.282.514
Exterior Lighting29.922.531.713
Visibility29.962.744.313

The table shows the 10 components with the most mentions, of 23.

Complaints that report a crash
43
Complaints that report a fire
9
Injuries in the complaints
19
Deaths in the complaints
2
Date of the newest complaint
17 Aug 2009

These figures are the entries of the persons who sent the complaints.

Complaint: A report about a possible safety problem that a person sends to NHTSA. This site shows the number of complaints and not their text.

Complaints about the 1995 Mitsubishi Eclipse, by the year NHTSA received them. The largest year is 2000, with 48 complaints.

Investigations

NHTSA investigations that name the 1995 Mitsubishi Eclipse
NumberTypeSubjectComponentOpenedClosedCampaign
RQ00015Recall queryLOWER CONTRTOL ARM BALL JOINTSuspension2 Aug 200020 Apr 200100V421001
RQ98007Recall queryTRANSFER CASE LEAKAGEPower Train / Automatic Transmission11 May 199828 Aug 199898V168001
EA98002Engineering analysisTRANSFER CASE LOCKUPWheels30 Jan 199830 Apr 199898V069001
PE97040Preliminary evaluationTRANSFER CASE LOCKUPWheels4 Sep 199730 Jan 1998

Investigation: A study of a possible safety defect by the NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation. An investigation with no closing date in the NHTSA file is open.

Other model years

The number under each year is the number of recall campaigns.

  1. 19890
  2. 19905
  3. 19912
  4. 19921
  5. 19931
  6. 19941
  7. 19955
  8. 19964
  9. 19973
  10. 19984
  11. 19992
  12. 20007
  13. 20017
  14. 20022
  15. 20033
  16. 20044
  17. 20053
  18. 20064
  19. 20074
  20. 20081
  21. 20091

A year without a link has fewer than 2 campaigns and fewer than 25 complaints. It has no page.

Official channels

Cite this page

Recall Register. 1995 Mitsubishi Eclipse: recalls and complaints. https://recallregister.com/vehicle/mitsubishi/eclipse/1995/. Source: NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation, recall, complaint and investigation files. Data through .

Sources

Source
NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation
Licence
US government work, public domain
Recall file through
29 Sep 2026
Complaint file through
29 Mar 2018
First complaint in the file
1 Jan 1995
Manufacturer in the recall file
MITSUBISHI AMERICA

The NHTSA record is the authority. A complaint count is the number of different complaint numbers for the make, the model and the model year. How the register is made. Report an error.

Questions

How many units are in the recall campaigns for the 1995 Mitsubishi Eclipse?
904,896 units in 5 campaigns. A campaign can name other models and model years, and its units include them.
How many recall campaigns does the Mitsubishi Eclipse have for all model years?
NHTSA lists 30 recall campaigns for the Mitsubishi Eclipse, model years 1989 to 2009. 5 of them name the 1995 model year.
Which component do the complaints about the 1995 Mitsubishi Eclipse name most often?
Engine and Engine Cooling: 64 of 435 component mentions, or 147.1 per 1,000. For all 1995 vehicles the figure is 148.5 per 1,000.
Is an NHTSA investigation of the 1995 Mitsubishi Eclipse open?
No. Each of the 4 investigations that name this model year has a closing date in the NHTSA file.