Recall Register

Vehicles › Mazda

Mazda RX3

Model years 1976–1976 · 3 recall campaigns · 0 complaints · 0 investigations · filed by MAZDA (NORTH AMERICA),INC

The Mazda RX3 appears on NHTSA's register for model years 1976 to 1976: 3 recall campaigns (3 model-year entries) and 0 consumer complaints.

No complaints for this line are in the NHTSA file.

Within Mazda, this line ranks 38 of 39 by total complaints.

Complaints are consumer reports and have not been verified by NHTSA.

Model years

Model yearRecallsComplaintsvs line averageUnits in campaigns
1976 Mazda RX330—13,205

"vs line average" is the model year's complaints as a share of the line's average per model year (100% = average). A campaign covering several model years counts once per year. Model years with one campaign and fewer than 25 complaints are listed but have no page of their own; the NHTSA link opens the agency's record.

Components most reported

Per 1,000 component mentions across all Mazda RX3 complaints (0 mentions).

Campaigns by year reported

90
94
98
02
06
10
14
18
22
26
Distinct NHTSA campaigns naming the Mazda RX3, by the year the Part 573 report was received.

Complaints by year received

26
Complaints about any Mazda RX3 model year, by year received.

Other Mazda model lines

Questions and answers

Which Mazda RX3 model years have the most recalls?

1976 (3). Across model years 1976–1976 there are 3 distinct campaigns.

Which Mazda RX3 model year has the most complaints?

No complaints for this line are in the NHTSA file.

What do owners of the Mazda RX3 complain about?

No complaints for this line are in the NHTSA file.

Where does this data come from?

NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation recall and complaint flat files, public domain, dated 29 Sep 2026 and 15 May 2019.

Provenance

Source: NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation recall, complaint and investigation flat files, public domain, dated 29 Sep 2026 and 15 May 2019. Model names are as NHTSA records them; variants such as "Accord" and "Accord Hybrid" are separate lines. See the methodology.