Revcon Camelot
The Revcon Camelot appears on NHTSA's register for model years 1979 to 1980: 2 recall campaigns (3 model-year entries) and 0 consumer complaints.
No complaints for this line are in the NHTSA file.
Within Revcon, this line ranks 3 of 6 by total complaints.
Complaints are consumer reports and have not been verified by NHTSA.
Model years
| Model year | Recalls | Complaints | vs line average | Units in campaigns |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1979 Revcon Camelot | 2 | 0 | — | 350 |
| 1980 Revcon Camelot NHTSA record | 1 | 0 | — | 208 |
"vs line average" is the model year's complaints as a share of the line's average per model year (100% = average). A campaign covering several model years counts once per year. Model years with one campaign and fewer than 25 complaints are listed but have no page of their own; the NHTSA link opens the agency's record.
Components most reported
Per 1,000 component mentions across all Revcon Camelot complaints (0 mentions).
Campaigns by year reported
Complaints by year received
Other Revcon model lines
- 250 10 recalls · 0 complaints
- Buckingham 3 recalls · 0 complaints
- Camelot 3 recalls · 0 complaints
- Hyde Park 3 recalls · 0 complaints
- Transcom 3 recalls · 0 complaints
- Windsor 3 recalls · 0 complaints
Questions and answers
Which Revcon Camelot model years have the most recalls?
1979 (2), 1980 (1). Across model years 1979–1980 there are 2 distinct campaigns.
Which Revcon Camelot model year has the most complaints?
No complaints for this line are in the NHTSA file.
What do owners of the Revcon Camelot complain about?
No complaints for this line are in the NHTSA file.
Where does this data come from?
NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation recall and complaint flat files, public domain, dated 24 Sep 2026 and 15 May 2019.
Provenance
Source: NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation recall, complaint and investigation flat files, public domain, dated 24 Sep 2026 and 15 May 2019. Model names are as NHTSA records them; variants such as "Accord" and "Accord Hybrid" are separate lines. See the methodology.